Cases 61 - 70 of 117
HSU v. RAY et al
as 3:2017cv02329
Plaintiff:
GISELLE HSU
Defendant:
JOSEPH RAY, BRYANT MEYERS, TODD GIESE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Fox v. Bayside State Prison, et al
as 17-1707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY FOX
Defendant - Appellee:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY and others
JEFFERSON v. DEAMER et al
as 1:2016cv09489
Plaintiff:
WELSEY JEFFERSON
Defendant:
DARLENE DEAMER, JEFFREY POMERANTZ, SOUTHERN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY HOUSE STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENLY v. THE RUTGERS STATE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2016cv09292
Plaintiff:
TYRONE KENLY
Defendant:
THE RUTGERS STATE UNIVERSITY, RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL HEALTH SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OBERUCH v. THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 3:2016cv06753
Plaintiff:
JOHN OBERUCH, JR.
Defendant:
THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
KHANNA v. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2016cv01330
Plaintiff:
YATIN KHANNA
Defendant:
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY , ANDREA C WEST , CECILE A FELDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
NIBLACK v. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2016cv00504
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L. NIBLACK
Defendant:
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY , UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIBLACK v. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY et al
as 3:2016cv00509
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L. NIBLACK
Defendant:
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY , UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.