Cases 61 - 70 of 3,726
Guillermo Garcia Hembree v. Michael Rojas
as 24-11966
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO GARCIA HEMBREE, a.k.a. Will Hembree
Defendant:
MICHAEL STEVE ROJAS
Rojas v. IJ Wireless Inc et al
as 1:2024cv04976
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
IJ Wireless Inc, Abidsa Begum and Emila Zoey
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rojas v. Burger King Company LLC
as 1:2024cv04525
Plaintiff:
Brandon Rojas
Defendant:
Burger King Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gonzalez v. Estate of Guadalupe T. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv02254
Defendant:
Rosalinda T. Mora, William Amatno, Mariela Torres Crespy and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coke v. Rojas et al
as 5:2024cv00294
Defendant:
Arnulfo Rojas and LR Trucking, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elma Coke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Barraza-Rojas v. LNU
as 2:2024cv00599
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Plaintiff:
Jesus Adrian Barraza-Rojas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas v. Bennett
as 24-3626
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO SALGADO ROJAS
Respondent:
JASON BENNETT, Superintendent
Rojas v. Debt Relief Advocates, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04776
Defendant:
Cordoba Legal Group PLLC, Law Office of Peter M. Daigle, P.C., The, Debt Relief Advocates, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Eusebio-Rojas v. Singh et al
as 1:2024cv04343
Plaintiff:
Eric Eusebio-Rojas
Defendant:
Harpreet Singh and HSG LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Whitfield v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04667
Defendant:
John J. Salinas, Daniel K Shine, City of Chicago, Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Corris A Whitfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
