Cases 61 - 70 of 134
Simmons v. Devine et al
as 1:2016cv01061
Plaintiff:
Christine Ann Simmons
Defendant:
Thomas Devine and Cottrell Truck Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Acosta et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, et al.
as 8:2015cv03836
Plaintiff:
Ronald Layne Smith, Ryan C. Rasmussen, Reginald J. Belton and others
Defendant:
KBR Inc, Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, Halliburton Company and others
Receiver:
Jimmy Dwayne Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02791
Plaintiff:
Bettye Simmons
Defendant:
Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Short et al v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01511
Plaintiff:
Ursula Short , Anna Eddings , Pervaiz M. Akhter and others
Defendant:
Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Simmons v. Zies et al
as 1:2015cv01447
Plaintiff:
Anthony Simmons
Defendant:
S. Zies and Brandley A. Wilt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Germain v. Bishop et al
as 1:2015cv01421
Plaintiff:
Jean B. Germain
Defendant:
Frank Bishop, Jr., Bruce A. Liller, William Beaman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hirsch et al v. Krek
as 1:2015cv00985
Plaintiff:
George Hirsch , John Lescure and Michael Richard Simmons
Defendant:
Lester J. Krek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hirsch et al v. Krek
as 8:2015cv00985
Plaintiff:
George Hirsch , John Lescure and Michael Simmons
Defendant:
Lester J. Krek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Minor et al v. Prince George's County, Maryland et al
as 8:2015cv00983
Plaintiff:
Michele E Minor and Kira R. Simmons
Defendant:
Prince George's County, Maryland, Melvin C. High and Kendal Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bloyer et al v. Simmons
as 1:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
RaChell Bloyer and Gary Bloyer
Defendant:
Shannan Annette Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
