Cases 61 - 70 of 22,738
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Austin v. Kemper Independence Insurance Company (2167877)
as 3:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
George Jarvis Austin
Defendant:
Kemper Independence Insurance Company (2167877), Diane Kaneyuki, Kevork Artinian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mosgrove v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
Tom Mosgrove
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, City of Morgan Hill, Scott Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Dorsey v. County of Alameda
as 4:2024cv02089
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dorsey
Defendant:
County of Alameda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Marshall v. Alameda Contra Costa Transit District et al
as 4:2024cv00996
Plaintiff:
Danny Marshall
Defendant:
Alameda Contra Costa Transit District, Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 192 and Robert L. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Greene v. U.S District Court-Northern District of California
as 4:2024cv02035
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene
Defendant:
U.S District Court-Northern District of California
Roberson v. Alameda County
as 4:2024cv02054
Plaintiff:
Jahbree Roberson
Defendant:
Alameda County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
