Cases 61 - 70 of 429,297
THOMAS v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
MARIO M THOMAS
Defendant:
JAMES WILLIAM MILLER, SHAWN SWAIN and DAWN A HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
CHARITY NOELLE WOOD
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DDD WAREHOUSE, LLC v. RICHARDSON et al
as 3:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
DDD WAREHOUSE, LLC
Defendant:
TIMOTHY RICHARDSON and 29 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
YOUNG v. WCTV NEWS CHANNEL
as 4:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
DA'VHON YOUNG
Defendant:
WCTV NEWS CHANNEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. LEBLANC et al
as 4:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
PARIS DEMETRIUS EVANS
Defendant:
BOB LEBLANC, GARY E MOLEK, HEATHER DANIELLE PASTOOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETRIE v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
as 3:2024cv00145
Defendant:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION and USAA
Plaintiff:
Mary Petrie
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
CAREY v. THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CAREY
Defendant:
THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
RUTLEDGE v. DEVORE-GUIFARRO et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Defendant:
BRACHER, E DEVORE-GUIFARRO, BODIFORD and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE VINCENT RUTLEDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAN PEDRO INVESTMENTS LLC v. MAXUM INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 4:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
SAN PEDRO INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
MAXUM INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
