Cases 61 - 70 of 49,327
RASHLEY v. First Enroll, LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80473
Plaintiff:
KYLE BUTLER RASHLEY
Defendant:
First Enroll, LLC and Access One Consumer Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jones et al v. I.Q. Data International, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
Kevin A Jones and Caroline A Bodington Jones
Defendant:
I.Q. Data International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Taylor v. H.I. Naples, LLC, et al
as 2:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Taylor as Personal Representative to the Estate of C.A.
Defendant:
H.I. NAPLES, LLC and SHREE SIDDHIVINAYAK HOSPITALITY, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv14118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Corn, Jr. v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00978
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lahav v. Binance Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2024cv21421
Plaintiff:
Nir Lahav
Defendant:
Binance Holdings Limited, BAM Trading Services Inc., BAM Management U.S. Holdings, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities & Exchange Commiss
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
