Cases 71 - 80 of 150
Butler v. Estes et al
as 6:2015cv00162
Petitioner:
Larry Lee Butler
Respondent:
DeWayne Estes and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ferguson et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv02396
Plaintiff:
Cecil M Ferguson and William W Horsman, III
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Alabama Dept of Corrections , DeWayne Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Upton v. Estes et al
as 4:2014cv02231
Petitioner:
Mark Upton
Respondent:
Dewayne Estes and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conner v. Estes
as 2:2014cv01889
Plaintiff:
Curtis Conner, Jr.
Defendant:
DeWayne Estes
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. Estes
as 5:2014cv01871
Petitioner:
Charles Vernon Harris, Jr
Respondent:
Dewayne Estes and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ferguson et al v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv01012
Plaintiff:
Cecil M. Ferguson and William W. Horsman, III
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Alabama Dept of Corrections , Dewayne Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Estes et al
as 4:2014cv01844
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Dudley, Jr.
Respondent:
DeWayne Estes and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hayes v. Estes et al
as 5:2014cv01779
Petitioner:
Rohn O Hayes
Respondent:
Dewayne Estes, Alachua County Florida and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Estes et al
as 2:2014cv01767
Petitioner:
Roderick E Jackson
Respondent:
Dewayne Estes and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bush v. Estes et al
as 5:2014cv01316
Petitioner:
James Josiah Bush
Respondent:
DeWayne Estes and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
