Cases 71 - 80 of 869
Staples v. Ducey, et al
as 2:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
James Staples
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, David Shinn, Jeffrey Van Winkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Ducey et al
as 2:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Charles Ferguson
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, David Byers and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Ducey et al
as 2:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Clarence D Johnson and HTH Construction
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Medical Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Ducey
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Dominique Brown
Defendant:
Doug Ducey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Grodevant et al v. Biden et al
as 2:2021cv02190
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Grodevant, Katherine Lee Grodevant and Unknown Parties
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, United States Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv08271
Plaintiff:
Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant:
HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Grodevant v. Ducey et al
as 2:2021cv02149
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Grodevant
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, Karen Fann and Wendy Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Taebel v. Trump et al
as 2:2021cv02066
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, Doug Ducey, Mark Brnovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell Taebel v. County of Maricopa, et al
as 21-16919
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MITCHELL TAEBEL
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MARICOPA, DOUG DUCEY, AZ Governor, MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, AZ Attorney General and others
Tommy Quintier, Jr. v. Doug Ducey, et al
as 21-16677
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOMMY QUINTIER, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG DUCEY, Governor and STATE OF ARIZONA, Real Party in Interest/Respondent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
