Cases 71 - 80 of 121
Marx v. Forsyth County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2013cv00175
Plaintiff:
Dennis Marx
Defendant:
Forsyth County Sheriff's Office, Robert Heagerty, R. J. Wiggins and others
White v. Hiers et al
as 1:2013cv02404
Plaintiff:
Antoine Antonio White
Defendant:
Duane L. Hiers, Jr., Samuel F. Patterson, Evelyn Wynn Dixon and others
Ferguson et al v. Mentor Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv00227
Defendant:
MENTOR CORPORATION and MENTOR WORLDWIDE
Plaintiff:
DARRYL DUANE FERGUSON and PATTY FULTON FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hendrix v. Piper et al
as 2:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
Stanley John Hendrix
Defendant:
Duane Piper and Deputy Unknown
Schaff v. United States Of America
as 2:2013cv00072
Petitioner:
Donald Duane Schaff
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Brady Center To Prevent Gun Violence v. City of Nelson, Georgia et al
as 2:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
Brady Center To Prevent Gun Violence
Defendant:
City of Nelson, Georgia , Jonathan Bishop , Duane Cronic and others
Intervenor:
GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. (a Georgia corporation)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robbins v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv01566
Plaintiff:
Duane Robbins
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group Inc
Halsey v. Beske et al
as 1:2013cv01206
Plaintiff:
Thomas Halsey
Defendant:
Michael Glenn Beske, Wesley Shea Payne, Duane Salvatore Whisenhult and others
Williams v. Morales
as 2:2013cv00032
Petitioner:
Carl Duane Williams
Respondent:
Jose Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polston et al v. Heyl Truck Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03655
Plaintiff:
Craig Polston , Barbara Sue Marsh and James Edward Marsh
Defendant:
Heyl Truck Lines, Inc., Discover Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Red Rock Risk Retention Group, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
