Cases 71 - 80 of 189
DA SILVA v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04111
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC., MICAELA FERNANDES, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DA SILVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
DeRichie v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2019cv01183
Defendant:
Geisinger Clinic, Gerald N. Larar, Gloria A. Pombo and others
Plaintiff:
Michael F. DeRichie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TOWER HEALTH et al v. CHS/COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 5:2019cv02782
Plaintiff:
PI SIX, LLC, PI FIVE, LLC, TOWER HEALTH and others
Defendant:
POTTSTOWN HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC, PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC and CHS/COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WRIGHT v. THE ROHO GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02623
Defendant:
EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER, EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK, THE ROHO GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KENYOCK WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00640
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WAHPOE v. STAFFMORE, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01268
Defendant:
COMMUNITY COUNCIL HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. and STAFFMORE, LLC
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER WAHPOE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04484
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03514
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
