Cases 71 - 80 of 325
Gonzalez et al v. Mederos et al
as 1:2015cv23355
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Mederos Cigars LLC
Plaintiff:
Luis Gonzalez, Omar Gonzalez, Soneros Cigars Zone, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Lightbourne House, LLC and 2023 LLC
Defendant:
Juan Carlos Mederos and Robert Mederos
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Nugent et al v. Stripe A Zone, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00614
Plaintiff:
Gilford Nugent , Dalton McDermott and Bronta Washington
Defendant:
Stripe A Zone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Royal Printex Inc v. Jester Importing Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00540
Plaintiff:
Royal Printex Inc
Defendant:
Jester Importing Inc, K and L Wholesales Corp, Does 1 through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Johnson v. Auto Zone Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv01060
Plaintiff:
Dion Laroy Johnson
Defendant:
Auto Zone Inc., Kathryn White and Venus Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES v. E-STYLE ZONE, INC.
as 1:2016cv00203
Plaintiff:
NOEL DE JESUS MUNOS TORRES
Defendant:
E-STYLE ZONE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adams et al v. Stripe A Zone, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
David Adams , Harold Black and Willard Soils
Respondent:
Stripe A Zone, Inc.
Mediator:
William Cornelius
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Mia Mason v. Machine Zone, Inc.
as 15-2469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIA MASON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
MACHINE ZONE, INC., a Delaware corporation
Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. Custom Zone, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv01963
Defendant:
Custom Zone, Inc., Does and Ruslan Gasimov
Plaintiff:
Disney Enterprises, Inc.
Hernandez v. Laundry Zone, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv22708
Plaintiff:
Dagoberto Catalino Diaz Hernandez
Defendant:
Laundry Zone, Inc., Joseph Lahoud and Jeanne D'arc Lahoud
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. J&J Comfort Zone Inc et al
as 2:2015mc00090
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
J&J Comfort Zone Inc
Garnishee:
Bank of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
