Cases 71 - 78 of 78
ESTATE OF JOHN SILVESTRO et al v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2009cv04484
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JOHN SILVESTRO, JOHN SILVESTRO, III, LOVISHA DIXON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and JOHN DOES I-IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor et al v. Knopp et al
as 3:2009cv00256
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Taylor, Timothy J. Eicher and Derrick Peyton
Defendant:
William Donnie Knopp, J. T. Reynolds, Mark Whitehouse and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
1st Source Bank v. Best-One Tire Of Crossville, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00036
Plaintiff:
1st Source Bank
Defendant:
Best-One Tire Of Crossville, Inc., Nicholas R. Proffitt and John Doe I-IV
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Sharon Hazelwood v. Tennessee Department of Safety, et al
as 08-6087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARON HAZELWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, FRED PHILLIPS, in his official capacity as Commissioner, TOM MOORE, in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner and others
Diamond Electric, Inc. v. Pace Pacific Corporation, et al
as 08-15772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIAMOND ELECTRIC, INC., a Nevada corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
PACE PACIFIC CORPORATION, an Arizona corporation, JOHN DOES, I - IV and XYZ CORPORATIONS, I - V
LOUGHMAN v. MUNDING et al
as 1:2007cv05272
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LOUGHMAN
Defendant:
MARK E. MUNDING, FEDEX CORP., FEDEX GROUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Hutchinson v. Pennington
as 3:2007cv00424
Plaintiff:
Chasity Hutchinson and Chasity Hutchinson
Defendant:
David Pennington, Wayne County Sheriff's Department, David L. Lemon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
