Cases 71 - 80 of 541
Cameron v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cameron
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Rollin Cook, Scott Semple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watley v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Derek Watley
Defendant:
Robert Martin, Richard Ortyl, Brian Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coons v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Steven Coons
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
William Young
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Martin, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chisem v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Robert Chisem
Defendant:
Robert Martin, Richard Ortyl and Briant Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Asante v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Kwame O Asante
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarrama and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparadeo v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Zachary Sparadeo
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarramma and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Michael John Hall
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Williams v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
David George Williams
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarramma and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrrell v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Shane Anton Tyrrell
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley and Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
