Cases 71 - 80 of 173
Blankenship v. UNUM Group
as 1:2015cv01121
Plaintiff:
Joseph Blankenship
Defendant:
UNUM Group
Miscellaneou:
Pam Carter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jester v. Davidson County District Attorneys Office et al
as 3:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Jester
Defendant:
Davidson County District Attorneys Office, Metro Police Dept., Pam Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmerson et al v. Wilson & Associates, PLLC et al
as 1:2015cv01020
Plaintiff:
Baron Jimmerson and Kimberly Y. Jimmerson
Defendant:
Wilson & Associates, PLLC and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Miscellaneou:
Pam Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harmon v. Cantrell et al (VVV)
as 3:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
James H Harmon, Jr
Defendant:
- Cantrell, Sheriff Berrong, Captain Neubert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pillow v. Pam Smith Painting et al
as 4:2014cv00077
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Pillow
Defendant:
Pam Smith Painting and Pam Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pillow v. Smith
as 4:2014cv00076
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Pillow
Defendant:
Pam Smith and Pam Smith Painting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pillow v. Smith
as 3:2014cv01999
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Pillow
Defendant:
Pam Smith and Pam Smith Painting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pillow v. Pam Smith Painting et al
as 3:2014cv01948
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Pillow
Defendant:
Pam Smith Painting and Pam Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowling et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00270
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bowling and Pam Bowling
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Estate of James B. Tacy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Health Integration Specialists, LLC v. Nepute et al
as 1:2014cv01206
Plaintiff:
Health Integrations Specialists, LLC
Defendant:
Eric Nepute and Nepute DC Wellness Center, P.C.
Miscellaneou:
Pam Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
