Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 89
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Deal v. Mim et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00363
Plaintiff: Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant: FNU Mim and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Roger Deal, Sr. v. Dr. Mickla
as 12-6791
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant - Appellee: DR. MICKLAS
Defendant: CAPE FEAR VALLEY HOSPITAL, HEAD MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF THE UTILIZATION REVIEW BOARD, NURSE PADGETT and others
Deal v. Mim et al
as 5:2012ct03086
Plaintiff: Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant: Ms. Mim and Unknown Mail Room
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Deal, Sr. v. Dr. Owen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-6595
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant - Appellee: DR OWENS and SAMI HASSEN
Defendant: KENNETH PRICE, JR. and HEAD DIRECTOR UTILIZATION REVIEW BOARD
Deal v. North Carolina Department of Correction Medical Department et al
as 5:2012ct03079
Plaintiff: Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant: North Carolina Department of Correction Medical Department, Nurse Stevens, Sargent Triplet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Deal v. North Carolina
as 5:2012hc02067
Petitioner: Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Respondent: North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Deal v. Stevens et al
as 5:2012ct03014
Plaintiff: Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant: Nurse Stevens, Sargent Triplet, North Carolina Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deal v. Cooper et al
as 5:2011ct03169
Plaintiff: Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant: Roy Cooper and Robert C Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deal v. Ivarsson et al
as 5:2011ct03161
Plaintiff: Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant: Carl Ivarsson, Craig B. Ellis and Jeffrey Miles Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deal v. Best et al
as 5:2011ct03091
Plaintiff: Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant: Officer Best and North Carolina Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?