Cases 71 - 80 of 254
Simmons v. Saul
as 5:2019cv00334
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stevenson v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2019ct03216
Plaintiff:
John L. Stevenson, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Sargent Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department et al
as 3:2019cv00342
Defendant:
FNU Officer Kellough, Charlotte Mecklenburg Magistrate Office, Scottie P Carson and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Simmons et al
as 3:2019cv00285
Plaintiff:
David Ezell Simpson
Defendant:
FNU Simmons, FNU Bowditch and FNU Kimbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colburn v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company et al
as 4:2019cv00051
Defendant:
Michael R. Simmons, David F. Underdown, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
David E Colburn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Colburn v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company et al
as 5:2019cv00139
Defendant:
Michael R. Simmons, David F. Underdown, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
David E Colburn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Simmons-Bey v. Godwin et al
as 5:2019ct03080
Plaintiff:
Alton Gregory Simmons-Bey and Gregory Simmons-Bey
Defendant:
J.L. Godwin, Amy Breighton, M.S. Kozazcki, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons-Bey v. USA Republic Corporation ET
as 5:2019hc02095
Petitioner:
Gregory Simmons-Bey and Alton Gregory Simmons-Bey
Respondent:
USA Republic Corporation ET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Simmons v. Mail Room Staff
as 5:2019ct03013
Plaintiff:
Roderick Bernard Simmons
Defendant:
Mail Room Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
