Cases 71 - 80 of 89
Azael Dythian Perales v. Virgin Mobile USA et al
as 8:2011cv01656
Defendant:
Jeff Auman, BBVA, BNP Paribas and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Murphy v. Eastern Louisiana Mental Health System et al
as 3:2011cv00318
Defendant:
Caddo Detention Center, Eastern Louisiana Mental Health System, Patton State Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. MURPHY
as 4:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
TAVARISS DAVIS
Defendant:
STEPHEN MURPHY, TIMOTHY MURPHY and ELISE BLAIR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Barksdale Federal Credit Union et al
as 3:2011cv00040
Defendant:
Barksdale Federal Credit Union, Federal Bureau of Investigation, TSA Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Navy et al
as 3:2011cv00186
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Defendant:
U S Dept of Navy, Louisiana Supreme Court, John Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Response
as 3:2011cv00023
Defendant:
Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Response
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Attorney Disciplinary Board et al
as 3:2011cv00020
Defendant:
Attorney Disciplinary Board, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of Disability Adjudication and Review and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Titus et al
as 1:2009cv00794
Plaintiff:
Fred Mosley and Fred Mosley
Defendant:
Victor Titus, Stephen Murphy and Titus & Murphy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Murphy v. Amtrack Railroad Claim Office
as 3:2008cv00805
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Defendant:
Amtrack Railroad Claim Office
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Murphy v. Bush
as 3:2008cv00789
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Defendant:
George W Bush
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.