Cases 71 - 80 of 84
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv03401
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02103
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
TROSO v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY et al
as 1:2010cv01566
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TROSO
Defendant:
CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, STERLING WHEATEN, SYED SHAH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
TARIQ-SHUAIB v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2009cv04760
Plaintiff:
SYED M. TARIQ-SHUAIB
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN and STATE OF NJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EVERBANK v. SYED et al
as 2:2009cv02639
Plaintiff:
EVERBANK
Defendant:
HASSAN M. SYED, HOMETOWN MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC., GOLDSTEIN & BACHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02323
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
OPTIMA TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC. v. NETSOL, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2008cv02348
Plaintiff:
OPTIMA TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC.
Defendant:
NETSOL, L.L.C., BILAL ZIA and ZAHRA SYED
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SYED v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2008cv00831
Plaintiff:
UWAIS M. SYED
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, PAUL NOVAK, EMILIO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv05110
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
