Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,181,620
Harris v. Chesterfield County et al
as 2:2024cv00250
Plaintiff: Terrell Harris
Defendant: Chesterfield County and Riverside Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff: Joshua K. Bowen
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Med Staff of RRJ et al
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff: Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant: Med Staff of RRJ, Macky and Portia Bennactt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Thompson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff: Tavarus Thompson
Defendant: Johnson, William Diehl, Kevin Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Borda
as 3:2024cv02307
Petitioner: Jasper W. Bailey
Respondent: Warden Ron E. Borda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02309
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castillanos v. State of Georgia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01656
Petitioner: Eduardo Castillanos
Defendant: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent: State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crafton v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff: Demetrius Crafton
Defendant: Wendy Davis, Bailey Goodwin, Timothy Stucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blount v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00314
Plaintiff: Carl Blount
Defendant: Ron Neal, Pamela Bane and Mark Newkirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02917
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?