Cases 71 - 80 of 268
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Goodwill Industries of Mississippi
as 3:2016cv00729
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Goodwill Industries of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Natchez Casino OpCo, LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00080
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Natchez Casino OpCo, LLC and Premier Gaming Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. The Laurel School District
as 2:2016cv00145
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
The Laurel School District
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Fred's Inc.
as 3:2016cv00701
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Fred's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
America's Home Place, Inc. v. Barlow et al
as 3:2016cv00623
Plaintiff:
America's Home Place, Inc.
Defendant:
Ryan Barlow and Acadiana Custom Homes, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Howard v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2016cv00127
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and General Motors LLC
Plaintiff:
Howard and Warren Howard
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
United States Specialty Sports Association, Inc. v. Shoemaker et al
as 1:2016cv00247
Plaintiff:
United States Specialty Sports Association, Inc.
Defendant:
Dennis Shoemaker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Dennis Pierce, Inc. et al v. Pierce et al
as 2:2016cv00102
Plaintiff:
Dennis Pierce, Inc. and Piercon, Inc.
Defendant:
Letitia Pierce
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Couch and Madison Partners v. Richardson
as 3:2016cv00485
Plaintiff:
Couch and Madison Partners
Defendant:
Anita Ward Richardson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Liberty Bank & Trust Company
as 3:2016cv00444
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Liberty Bank & Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
