Cases 71 - 80 of 77,096
Logsdon v. Woods et al
as 5:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Richard Logsdon
Defendant:
Billy Woods and FNU Cochran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaber v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Faquzi Abdul-Menhem Jaber
Defendant:
W. Rodriguez, A. Christian, FNU Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hall et al v. Carner et al
as 2:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Wendall Hall and Tonnie Nealy
Defendant:
Jon Carner, Mr. Houston, Ms. Serina Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaynor v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Clifford Gaynor
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Centurion of Florida, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Finkle et al
as 8:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Ross
Defendant:
Brandon L. Finkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz, Jorge v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv60579
Plaintiff:
Jorge Ruiz
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daughtry, Phillip v. Parret
as 2:2024cv14111
Plaintiff:
Phillip Junior Daughtry
Defendant:
John Parret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00332
Petitioner:
James Kyle Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Briggs v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 5:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
Janiecia Denise Briggs
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lagrandeur v. Najjar et al
as 2:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lagrandeur
Defendant:
Correction officer A. Najjar, Correction officer N. Olvera, Correction officer J.S. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
