Cases 81 - 90 of 6,816
Isaacs v. City of Susanville et al
as 2:2024cv01707
Defendant:
Michael Hoover, Kevin Singletary, City of Susanville and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Isaacs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11489
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Larbi v. Mitchell
as 1:2024cv00905
Defendant:
C/O Isaac S. Mitchell
Plaintiff:
Michael Larbi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00816
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 1:2024cv01181
Defendant:
UNIDENTIFIED BUDGET COORDINATOR, CARLA COAKLEY, UNIDENTIFIED MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benavidez (PS) v. Gilden et al
as 1:2024cv01639
Defendant:
Jane Gilden and Kruger
Plaintiff:
Isaac Benavidez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 4:2024cv02142
Defendant:
FNU Russian, FNU Alfred, F/N/U Pavanchiluvoju and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Defendant:
FNU Dunbar, C.O. FNU Snead, Capt. FNU Sv and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPEECH FIRST, INC v. WHITTEN et al
as 1:2024cv00898
Defendant:
LAMAR HYLTON, ISAAC TORRES, DONNA B. SPEARS and others
Plaintiff:
SPEECH FIRST, INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Delgado et al v. Oldcastle Infrastructure, Inc.
as 1:2024at00571
Plaintiff:
Isaac Delgado and Raymond Ortiz
Defendant:
Oldcastle Infrastructure, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
