Cases 81 - 90 of 718
Cannady v. Schofield
as 1:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Lamar Cannady
Defendant:
Matthew Schofield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
DORIETY v SLETTEN et al
as 1:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
WAKITA DORIETY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA and MATTHEW LEWIS SLETTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Haley v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Edward C Haley
Defendant:
Garry L. McFadden, Wellpath, LLC, Mecklenburg County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICHARDSON-BEY v. SHELTON et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
LEROY RICHARDSON-BEY
Defendant:
WARDEN M. SHELTON, SGT. WATSON, WARDEN BRAYBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. DH-C601 LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
DH-C601 LLC doing business as Clutch Kitchen & Pour House, Domenico D. Marsocci and Matthew F. Porillo
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
DAVIS v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
WILMA KAY DAVIS
Defendant:
KEVIN AUSTIN, J. GREGORY MATTHEWS, VALARIE ZACHARY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
