Cases 81 - 90 of 130
Williams Oliver v. Danforth Hines et al
as 1:2012mc00040
Plaintiff:
Jane Williams Oliver
Defendant:
Charleyrene Danforth Hines , Patricia D'Rene Danforth Lethgo , Mary Kate Williams Johnson and others
Objector:
Larry Lethgo
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
US v. Eric William
as 12-4906
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC FREDERICK WILLIAMS, a/k/a Sweet
USA v. Frederick Sturm, Jr.
as 12-11104
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FREDERICK WILLIAM STURM, JR.
Williams v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00676
Plaintiff:
Frederick Williams
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Griswold v. Williams et al
as 1:2012cv00164
Plaintiff:
Steven Griswold
Defendant:
Frederick Williams and Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Williams v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv14335
Plaintiff:
Patrick Frederick Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Oliver v. Hines et al
as 1:2012cv01032
Plaintiff:
Jane Williams Oliver
Defendant:
Charleyrene Danforth Hines , Patricia D'Rene Dan Lethgo , Mary Kate Williams Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meeks et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2012cv04617
Plaintiff:
Iris Meeks , Richard Mann , Bruce Miller and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi-Aventis U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STEHLE v. COKER et al
as 4:2012cv00338
Plaintiff:
JAMES FREDERICK WILLIAM STEHLE, III
Defendant:
JAMES COKER and KENNETH S TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-11983
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
