Cases 81 - 90 of 163
BONET v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv11794
Defendant:
JEAN E. STANFIELD, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, STERN & EISENBERG, PC and others
Plaintiff:
EMILIO JEREMIAH BONET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FAISON et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. et al
as 2:2018cv11755
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC, JP MORGAN CHASE and others
Plaintiff:
ELVA J. FAISON and ALFRED R. FAISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
WHITE v. U.S. BANK N.A. et al
as 1:2018cv10683
Plaintiff:
CONNIE WHITE
Defendant:
U.S. BANK N.A., RICHARD K. DAVID, PLUESE, BECKER, SALTZMAN, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
DAVIS v. US BANK, NA et al
as 1:2018cv09745
Plaintiff:
LESA DAVIS
Defendant:
US BANK, NA , OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and HUBZU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES et al v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC et al
as 3:2018cv08984
Plaintiff:
DARREN JAMES and ADRIENNE JAMES
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
REYES et al v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC.
as 2:2018cv03954
Plaintiff:
LINA REYES and ROBINSON SANTACRUZ
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DONALD S. MACLACHLAN et al
as 2:2018cv01579
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DONALD S. MACLACHLAN, MACLACHLAN LAW OFFICES, LLC, MARIE NAPOLIELLO MACLACHLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
