Cases 81 - 90 of 490
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Ortmann v. Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01335
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Ortmann
Defendant:
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Peter Greenleaf and Joseph Miller
Petitioner:
Rasik Cauchon-Desai, ACDC Investments Limited, Roney Balson and others
Leacock v. IonQ, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01306
Plaintiff:
Michael Leacock
Defendant:
IonQ, Inc., Peter Chapman and Thomas Kramer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Albert et al v. Franchot
as 1:2022cv01558
Plaintiff:
Steven G Albert and barry diamond
Defendant:
Peter Franchot, in his official capacity as Comptroller of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
