Cases 81 - 90 of 578
Johnson v. McDonough
as 22-1651
Claimant:
R. WAYNE JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Johnson v. O'Daniel et al
as 4:2022cv01160
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Bobby Lumpkin and Gregg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv01074
Petitioner:
R Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01441
Plaintiff:
Barry Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re CIM-SQ Transfer Cases
as 3:2022mc80066
Plaintiff:
Charles Carter, Sr., Robert Lee Cole, Lovell Colvin and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ron Broomfield, State of California and others
Johnson v. Pfieffer et al
as 0:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Sarah Pfieffer, Amy Draeger, T.S. Barnetto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilation et al
as 4:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilation, San Quentin State Prison, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. DeGiusti et al
as 5:2021cv01155
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Timothy DeGiusti, Emily Fagan and Robert J Troester
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Johnson et al v. Peter et al
as 2:2021cv01602
Plaintiff:
Wayne Johnson and Bethany Johnson
Defendant:
Gilbert Peter and Gene Equity LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 21-11077
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony Wayne Johnson
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
