Cases 81 - 90 of 99
Brown v. Taneja et al
as 1:2010cv00087
Plaintiff:
Crystal Brown
Defendant:
Charu Taneja and Roger Williams Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Roy v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Norman R. Roy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Walburn v. Hyder et al
as 1:2009cv00389
Plaintiff:
Joann Walburn
Defendant:
Michael Hyder, MD and Cardiology Associates of Rhode Island, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Peckfelder v. Maguire, M.D.
as 1:2009cv00331
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Peckfelder
Defendant:
Kevin Maguire, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Barber v. Niles et al
as 1:2009cv00291
Plaintiff:
Anna H. Barber, Anna H. Barber and Anna H. Barber
Defendant:
Michael Niles, M.D., Barry Ross, M.D., Bradford Lavigne, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gerardi v. Conlin et al
as 1:2009cv00288
Plaintiff:
Susan Gerardi, Susan Gerardi and Susan Gerardi
Defendant:
William M. Conlin, M.D., Lisa Ahava, PA-C and The Westerly Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Corkum v. Thomas Ng, M.D.
as 1:2008cv00099
Plaintiff:
Russell Sumner Corkum
Defendant:
Thomas Ng, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Macamaux v. Millard et al
as 1:2007cv00485
Plaintiff:
Robert Macamaux and Robert Macamaux
Defendant:
Jack Millard, M.D., Roger Nelson, M.D. and Day Kimball Hospital
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hugelier v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv02017
Plaintiff:
Warren Scott Hugelier
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gaines v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv02035
Plaintiff:
Janie Marie Gaines
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
