Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Doe v. Roe et al
as 1:2023cv02526
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
John Roe, Jane Roe #1 and Jane Roe #2
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. abdlcommunityforus.com et al
as 1:2023cv02527
Defendant:
ABDLCOMMUNITYFORUS.com, ABDL Community, ABDL Community For All and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
lnu et al. v. Noltensmeyer
as 6:2023cv01085
Plaintiff:
Kiera lnu, Erin lnu, Fiona lnu and others
Defendant:
Alan Noltensmeyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Doe v. Roe
as 1:2023cv01149
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Jane Roe
Not Classified By Court:
Eugene Volokh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
LNU et al v. Brown
as 2:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Casseopeia LNU, Jane LNU, Erika LNU and others
Defendant:
Benjamin Deputy Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Enforcement of Judgment
Roe v. University of Central Oklahoma
as 5:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Defendant:
University of Central Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Herrera, et al v. City of Espanola, et al
as 21-2030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARREN HERRERA and PAULA GARCIA
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOES, 1-2, in their individual capacities, JANE ROES, 1-3 and CITY OF ESPANOLA, a municipality
Salazar et al v. Board of Regents of the New Mexico Military Institute et al
as 1:2020cv01029
Counter Defendant:
M.S.
Defendant:
John Doe, John Roe, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ricki Leigh Salazar and Ronnie Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
