Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jenkins v. Witworth et al
as 3:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Joseph Allen Jenkins
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Witworth, (f/n/u) Cane, (f/n/u) Eads and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Taylor et al
as 3:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Donnell Johnson
Defendant:
Cpl. f/n/u Taylor and Davidson County - Metro Gov't
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Cambell et al
as 3:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Antonio Anthony Walton
Defendant:
Officer Madison Cambell, Officer M. Stewart, Officer f/n/u Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguilera v. CCA et al
as 3:2020cv00417
Defendant:
CCA, Chris Brown, Trousdale County and others
Plaintiff:
Cae N. Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates v. Parker et al
as 3:2018cv00483
Plaintiff:
Derrick Gates
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Jonathan Lebo, Johnny Fitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Parker et al
as 3:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Randall Turner
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Jason Woodall, Jonathan Lebo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Washburn et al
as 3:2017cv01292
Plaintiff:
Marvin Green
Defendant:
Rusty Washburn, Yolanda Pittman, Joanna Veil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becton v. CCA et al
as 3:2016cv02282
Plaintiff:
Xavier Becton
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Rickaway, (f/n/u) Taylor, (f/n/u) Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stancliff v. Rutherford County Sheriff's Department
as 3:2016cv01446
Plaintiff:
Patricia Susan Stancliff
Defendant:
Rutherford County Sheriff's Department and (f/n/u) Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loyde v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Mack Mandrell Loyde
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Blair Leibach, (f/n/u) Corlew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
