Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee: Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant: Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor: Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court: 240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
State of Washington et al v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03026
Plaintiff: State of Washington, State of Oregon, State of Arizona and others
Defendant: United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert M Califf, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of Idaho, State of Iowa, State of Montana and others
Amicus Curiae: Legal Voice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff: Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., Janet Woodcock, M.D. and others
Intervenor Defendant: Danco Laboratories, LLC and Danco Laboratories LLC
Amicus Curiae: The Chattanooga National Memorial for the Unborn, Doctors for America, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. State of Texas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-50949
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: State of Texas
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: Erick Graham, Jeff Tuley and Mistie Sharp
Amicus Curiae: State of Indiana, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Not Classified By Court: Constitutional Accountability Center, Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice and others
SisterSong Women of Color Rep., et al v. Governor of the State of GA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-13024
Defendant / Appellant: MEG HEAP, MICHAEL FOWLER, SR., ROB LAW and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE and MARY KAY BACALLAO
Plaintiff / Appellee: ATLANTA WOMEN'S MEDICAL CENTER, SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE, FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER and others
Defendant / Appellee: PAUL HOWARD, JR. and FANI T. WILLIS
Amicus Curiae: THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS and others
Yashica Robinson, et al v. Attorney General, State of Ala, et al
as 20-11401
Defendant / Appellant: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and SCOTT HARRIS
Plaintiff / Appellee: YASHICA ROBINSON, ALABAMA WOMEN'S CENTER, WEST ALABAMA WOMEN'S CENTER and others
Not Classified By Court: AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, SERVICE, SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF VERMONT, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
South Wind Women's Center, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 20-6045
Defendant / Appellant: J. KEVIN STITT, in his official capacity as Governor of Oklahoma, DAVID PRATER, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Oklahoma County, GARY COX, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: LARRY A. BURNS, D.O, on behalf of himself and his staff and his patients, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC., on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients and SOUTH WIND WOMEN'S CENTER LLC, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, DBA Trust Women Oklahoma City
Amicus Curiae: THE AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, FIFTY-FOUR MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA SENATE AND OKLAHOMA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, NORTH AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY and others
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. et al v. Azar II et al
as 1:2019cv05433
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc.
Defendant: Office for Civil Rights, Roger Severino, Alex M. Azar II and others
Amicus Curiae: the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association et al v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv05435
Plaintiff: National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association and Public Health Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Roger Severino and others
Amicus Curiae: the American Muslim Health Professionals, Institute for Policy Integrity, The American Medical Association and others
Interested Party: Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc. and Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Mayor and City Council of Balt v. Alex Azar, II We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1614
Defendant / Appellant: OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Amicus Curiae: SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM, ALABAMA and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?