Cases 31 - 40 of 630
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Nicholls et al v. Greaves et al
as 1:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
David Nicholls, Adaptive Bobsled and Sports Association Inc, Denis Kozev and others
Defendant:
David Greaves, Larry Sidney, Adam Jeremy Edelman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cataldi v. IsoPlexis Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00981
Plaintiff:
Russel Cataldi
Defendant:
IsoPlexis Corporation, Sean Mackay, John G. Conley and others
Dunbar v. IsoPlexis Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00899
Plaintiff:
Dearl Dunbar
Defendant:
IsoPlexis Corporation, Sean Mackay, John G. Conley and others
CURRENT v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00055
Petitioner:
HEATH CURRENT
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Johnson et al v. Redstone Federal Credit Union et al
as 5:2022cv01504
Plaintiff:
Gloria Johnson and George Johnson, III
Defendant:
Redstone Federal Credit Union, Danny Adcock and Heath Emerson
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
USA v. Heath
as 22-11127
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Chadwick Daray Heath
HEATH v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01680
Petitioner:
VANVETTE HEATH
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
USA v. Dion Heath
as 22-3929
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DION HEATH
United States of America v. Sealed (Kamar Harrison)
as 22-2804
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ernest Conley, AKA Loc, AKA E-Loc, AKA EZ-Loc, Hector DeJesus, AKA Hec, Mark Lewis and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Kamar Harrison, AKA Dolo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
