Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Jenkins v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05037
Plaintiff:
Jay M. Jenkins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Jenkins v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Michael Jenkins
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and Gleenover Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Katherine Lane Jenkins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Parkins v. Staten et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Parkins
Defendant:
Deigarion M Staten, Scott Taylor, Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Jenkins-White et al
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Angela Jenkins-White and Moses Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2023cv00944
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Jenkins and Marshall Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Jackson et al
as 4:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Johnson, T Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 5:2023cv05102
Plaintiff:
Patricia Jackson, Mac Roger Jenkins, John Sims and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jenkins v. RBIS, LLC
as 4:2023cv04059
Plaintiff:
Steve Jenkins
Defendant:
RBIS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
