Cases 1 - 10 of 37,822
PEREZ v. HARRISON TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2025cv04409
Plaintiff:
APRIL PEREZ
Defendant:
HARRISON TOWNSHIP, PATROLMAN HENRY MCLAUGHLIN, CHIEF OF POLICE RONALD CUNDEY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Humphery v. Grey et al
as 1:2025cv05391
Plaintiff:
Patrice Humphery
Defendant:
Sharon Grey, Sarah Stewart, Angel Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitehead III v. Ives
as 5:2025cv00621
Plaintiff:
Henry Whitehead III
Defendant:
Stephen Ives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Bramo et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2025cv00376
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Williams
Defendant:
C/O Bramo, Zadarian Mills, Charlie Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Dudek
as 3:2025cv00363
Plaintiff:
Christine I. Henry
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC et al v. Chang
as 2:2025cv04359
Petitioner:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Financing LLC
Respondent:
Henry Chang
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv05355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Townsend v. Miller
as 2:2025cv00843
Petitioner:
Henry Alexander Townsend
Respondent:
Superintendent Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lamar Burno v. Lake Tech Institute of Public Safety, et al
as 25-11652
Plaintiff:
LAMAR BERNARD BURNO
Defendant:
LAKE TECH INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC SAFETY, LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ASHLEY MOODY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-6407
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
