Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Klein, Wendell et al v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of America
as 3:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Wendell Klein, Anna Klein and Carlton Klein
Defendant:
The Travelers Indemnity Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Clayborne v. Schmidt et al
as 2:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jack A Clayborne
Defendant:
Dale Schmidt, Sgt Polsin, Sgt Kuehl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleland v. Mortara Instrument Inc
as 2:2017cv00275
Plaintiff:
Carlton Cleland
Defendant:
Mortara Instrument Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holifield v. Kemper et al
as 1:2014cv01486
Petitioner:
Al Holifield
Respondent:
Paul Kemper and Lauren Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Clarke et al
as 1:2014cv01284
Plaintiff:
Carlton Allen Brown
Defendant:
David Clarke and Major Burmeister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlton, Elliot v. Dodge Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2012cv00695
Plaintiff:
Elliot O. Carlton, III
Defendant:
Dodge Correctional Institution , Carley Hemming and Amy Klug
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter, Carlton v. USA
as 3:2012cv00544
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Carlton A. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Forest Voice, LLC et al v. Town of Forest et al
as 3:2011cv00100
Plaintiff:
Forest Voice, LLC , Judi Beestman , Bill Dyer and others
Defendant:
Town of Forest , Roger Swanepoel , Carlton Cress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
EMBRY, CARLTON v. USA
as 3:2011cv00036
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Carlton Embry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HINTZ PROPERTIES LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00637
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HINTZ PROPERTIES LLC, JOHN C. HINTZ, NANCY R. HINTZ and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
