Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Hickson v. Haulcy
as 24-30165
Plaintiff:
Henry Hickson
Defendant:
Terrance Haulcy, Danny Henshaw, Captain Jones and others
Henshaw v. Wal-Mart Stores East LLC
as 6:2023cv02388
Plaintiff:
Wendy Marie Henshaw
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LLC, Wal-Mart Stores East, LLC and Saied Makled
Not Classified By Court:
Julie Walbroel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HENSHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv18163
Plaintiff:
DONALD HENSHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Isibor v. Stearns
as 1:2023cv00158
Petitioner:
Ehigie Henshaw Isibor
Respondent:
FNU Stearns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jeremiah Hill v. Nicholas Henshaw
as 23-1714
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH V. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS HENSHAW, Correctional Officer
Henshaw v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
William Earl Henshaw
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Montemayor v. Tom Green County Detention
as 23-10324
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steve Montemayor
Defendant / Appellee:
Tom Green County Detention Facility, Judge Penny Roberts, Lil John, Federal Agent and others
Hickson v. Haulcy et al
as 5:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Henry Hickson
Defendant:
Terrance Haulcy, Danny Henshaw, Capt Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montemayor v Federal Judge Parker et al
as 6:2023cv00007
Defendant:
Steve Montemayor, Federal Judge Parker, Judge Federal Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melissa Hanus et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04985
Plaintiff:
Melissa Hanus, Brittany Harper, Glen Kennedy and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
