Cases 1 - 10 of 300
Boudjerada, et al. v. Medary, et al.
as 24-2419
Plaintiff:
HASHEEM BOUDJERADA, DAMON COCHRAN-SALINAS, ERIN GRADY and others
Defendant:
SARAH MEDARY, Chief CHRIS SKINNER, CITY OF EUGENE and others
v. Rankin
as 2:2024mc50202
Defendant:
United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Michigan
Claimant:
TaLawna Rankin
Mixson v. Louisiana Horticulture Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Angele Mixson
Defendant:
Louisiana Horticulture Commission, Rob Barry, III, George Bofinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative
as 24-91
Petitioner:
CONNECTICUT MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC ENERGY COOPERATIVE
Respondent:
DREW RANKIN, JAMES SULLIVAN and JOHN BILDA
Skoda v. Gorman et al.
as 1:2023cv02416
Plaintiff:
James Skoda
Defendant:
Christopher M. Gorman, Alexander M. Cutler, H. James Dallas and others
Thomas Rankin v. PTC Alliance LLC, et al
as 23-8052
Respondent:
THOMAS P. RANKIN
Petitioner:
PTC ALLIANCE LLC and CARY HART
Defendant / Appellee:
BLACK DIAMOND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
United States of America v. Rankin
as 23-7882
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMES SULLIVAN, JOHN BILDA, EDWARD DEMUZZIO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DREW RANKIN
United States of America v. Rankin (Sullivan)
as 23-7887
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DREW RANKIN, JOHN BILDA, EDWARD DEMUZZIO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES SULLIVAN
United States of America v. Rankin (Bilda)
as 23-7875
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DREW RANKIN, JAMES SULLIVAN, EDWARD DEMUZZIO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN BILDA
Bushansky v. Gorman et al.
as 1:2023cv02257
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Christopher M. Gorman, Alexander M. Cutler, H. James Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
