Cases 1 - 10 of 9,151
Brown v. Parsons et al
as 4:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Tiequail Brown
Defendant:
Parsons, Echels, Wade Gilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sellers v. Macdill et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Zachary Wade Sellers
Defendant:
Justin Macdill, Carol Bradford, Chris Carr and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mustion et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03079
Plaintiff:
Zane Mustion, Curtis Wright, Ronald Trotter and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Wade v. City of South Fulton et al
as 1:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Barton Wade
Defendant:
City of South Fulton, Officer H. Crouch and Officer M. Paul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. Irving, et al.
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Carla Wade
Defendant:
Antionette Irving and John Doe Defendants 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yexley v. Reyes et al
as 1:2024cv01010
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Wade Yexley
Respondent:
Alejandro Reyes and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wade v. USA
as 4:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Wade, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
United States v. Elliott
as 24-7034
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LANCE WADE ELLIOTT
Standridge v. Pierce et al
as 4:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Tyler Standridge
Defendant:
Pierce, Wade and Does Classification and CO 1, Cummins Unit, ADC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riveros v. Robles et al
as 7:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Carol Juliana Riveros
Defendant:
Jonathan Humberto Robles, Ayala's Transport, Inc., Wade Hampton Wiles, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
