Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.32 Acres of Land
as 23-1935
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
0.32 ACRES OF LAND, OWNED BY GRACE MINOR TERRY, Roanoke County Tax Map Parcel No. 102 02-0000 and Being MVP Parcel No. VA-RO-5149 (AR RO-279.01)
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.32 Acres of Land, Owned by Grace Minor Terry
as 7:2021cv00099
Defendant:
0.32 Acres of Land, Owned by Grace Minor Terry
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.32 Acres of Land, Owned by Grace Minor Terry, et al
as 7:2020cv00136
Defendant:
0.32 Acres of Land, Owned by Grace Minor Terry and 2.20 Acres of Land, Owned by Hilah Parks Terry, Frank H. Terry, Jr., Elizabeth Lee Terry, John Coles Terry III, Grace Minor Terry
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 13.47 Acres of Land, Owned by John Coles Terry, III et al
as 7:2019cv00145
Defendant:
9.89 Acres of Land, Owned by Elizabeth Lee Terry, 8.37 Acres of Land, Owned by Frank H. Terry, Jr., John Coles Terry, III, and Elizabeth Lee Terry, 0.33 Acres of Land, Owned by Elizabeth Lee Terry and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Giles County, Craig County, Montgomery County, Roanoke County, Franklin County, and Pittsylvania County, Vir et al
as 7:2017cv00492
Defendant:
1.97 Acres of Land, Owned by Keith M. Wilson and Mary K. Wilson, 3.76 Acres of Land, Owned by Catherine Beckner Kingery, 2.05 Acres of Land, Owned by Howard M. Thompson and Christine W. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Amicus Curiae:
Tammy Belinsky and Daniel Breslau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
