Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Anderson v. The United States Of America et al
as 3:2024cv00522
Defendant:
Director of CIA, 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, U.S. Armed Forces and Military and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals et al
as 5:2022ct03117
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Taylor
Defendant:
4th Circuit Court of Appeals, Stubbs Perdue, Attorneys at Law, Christopher Venters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Witham v. Boyle et al
as 5:2019cv00260
Plaintiff:
Judson Witham
Defendant:
Terrence Boyle, The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, New York State and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Crawford v. Suddaby et al
as 1:2016cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
G. Suddaby, Tohenberg, William Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv04005
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Synan et al
as 1:2015cv01031
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Joseph Synan, Mark Murphy, Julian Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutcliffe v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv02310
Plaintiff:
John E. Sutcliffe
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv02309
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2015cv00312
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
THOMAS DAVIS, ROBERT JAMES DAVIS, PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wayne Williams-El v. Superior Court
as 12-7998
Petitioner - Appellant:
WAYNE A. WILLIAMS-EL
Respondent - Appellee:
SUPERIOR COURT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, 4TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
