Cases 1 - 10 of 5,152
Petrone v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02919
Plaintiff:
Sarah Petrone
Defendant:
Comm'r of SSA Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gunther v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
David A. Gunther
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Shackleford v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Dave Shackleford
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Yarusso v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Andrew Yarusso
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kasavana v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02885
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Kasavana
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McBride v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Darnell McBride
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Murer v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
Allison Rebecca Murer
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Harrell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02794
Plaintiff:
Robert James Harrell, Jr
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brown v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02809
Plaintiff:
Erinn Brown
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Reyes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02849
Plaintiff:
Indira Reyes
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
