Cases 1 - 10 of 752
Romero-Lemus v. Garland
as 24-1046
Petitioner:
BRYAN STEVEN ROMERO-LEMUS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Purewal v. InstaRisa Digital Dental Technologies, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Chandeep Purewal
Defendant:
InstaRisa Digital Dental Technologies, LLC, InstaRisa Technologies, LLC, Dr. Jose Arthur Mirelez Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lemus v. Clark County School District et al
as 2:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Rosa Lainez Lemus
Defendant:
Clark County School District, Dr. Jesus F. Jara, Ronnie Guerzon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dada, et al. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited, et al.
as 24-2179
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DADA, SERGIO ARAUZ, GABRIELA CACERES GUTIERREZ and others
Defendant:
NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and Q CYBER TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Guevara Lemus v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 1:2024cv21144
Plaintiff:
Lazara Guevara Lemus
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Leidy Padron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ford of Kendall, LLC v. Raudel Lemus, Jr.
as 24-10831
Plaintiff:
FORD OF KENDALL, LLC
Defendant:
RAUDEL LEMUS, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Ismael Zarco Sanchez, Gabriel Arguelles, Hector Aquino and others
Lemus Rivera v. Garland
as 24-1498
Petitioner:
JOSE JOEL LEMUS RIVERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
