Cases 1 - 10 of 207
Meyer v. John/Jane Doe et al
as 0:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Scott Meyer
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyer v. Welsch et al
as 0:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Scott Meyer
Defendant:
Olmsted County Court, Hans Holland, "Kim" and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beyer v. Rardin et al
as 0:2023cv03770
Plaintiff:
Brandon Beyer
Defendant:
Jared Rardin, H. Hanson, Nancy Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marohn v. Minnesota Board of Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying, Landscape Architecture, Geoscience, and Interior Design, The et al
as 0:2023cv03717
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Marohn, Jr.
Defendant:
Minnesota Board of Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying, Landscape Architecture, Geoscience, and Interior Design, The, Melisa Rodriguez, Daniel Kelsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyer v. O'Malley
as 0:2023cv03461
Plaintiff:
Dawn Jean Meyer
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02818
Plaintiff:
Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Meyer v. Austin et al
as 0:2023cv02745
Plaintiff:
Earl Robert Meyer
Defendant:
Lloyd J Austin, Christine E Wormuth, Lloyd J. Austin, III and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Meyer v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01819
Plaintiff:
Barbara Meyer
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Evenstad v. Ellison et al
as 0:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Thomas Evenstad
Defendant:
Keith Maurice Ellison, Amy Klobuchar, Mike Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
