Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Warner WaldenIn re: Warner Walden
as 20-3163
Respondent:
J. SMOOT and A. RICHARD CAPUTO
Petitioner:
In re: WARNER L. WALDEN
John ChampionIn re: John Champion
as 20-1295
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN A. CHAMPION
Respondent:
A. RICHARD CAPUTO and WARDEN GENE BEASLEY
Michael ReynoldsIn re: Michael Reynolds
as 19-2736
Not Yet Classified:
A. RICHARD CAPUTO
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Edward McLaughlin v. Todd Henry, et al
as 19-2643
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY J. HARDING, Task Force Officer, JUDGE A. RICHARD CAPUTO, TODD E. HENRY, Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD MCLAUGHLIN
MCLAUGHLIN v. HENRY et al
as 1:2019cv09451
Petitioner:
EDWARD J. MCLAUGHLIN
Defendant:
LARRY WHITEHEAD, TIMOTHY HANDING, TODD EDWARD HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
In re: Michael Reynold
as 17-2873
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Trustee - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
A. RICHARD CAPUTO
In re: Reggie McCoy, et al
as 17-2831
Petitioner:
In re: REGGIE L. MCCOY
Respondent:
WARDEN J. BALTAZAR
Nominal Respondent:
A. RICHARD CAPUTO
In re: Charles Williams Bey
as 15-2771
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES WILLIAMS BEY
Defendant - Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DRUG AND ALCOHOL PROGRAMS, funds the Department of Corrections drug and alcohol programs, CATHERINE C. MCVEY, Chairperson at Pa. Board of Probation and Parole and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
A. RICHARD CAPUTO
In re: Charles Williams Bey
as 15-2040
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES WILLIAMS BEY
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, CATHERINE C. MCVEY, CHairperson at PA. Board of Probation and Parole and others
Nominal Respondent:
A. RICHARD CAPUTO
In Re: Akilah Shabazz
as 15-1198
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
AKILAH SHABAZZ
Nominal Respondent:
A. RICHARD CAPUTO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
