Cases 1 - 10 of 1,138
Smith v. NuStar Energy L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Ryan Smith
Defendant:
NuStar Energy L.P., Bradley Barron, J. Dan Bates and others
Williams Rowland Acquisition Corp. v. Global Food and Ingredients Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Williams Rowland Acquisition Corp.
Defendant:
Global Food and Ingredients Ltd. and Maxim Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Windsor, III v. Warden Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00425
Petitioner:
William T. Windsor, III
Respondent:
Warden Emig and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett et al v. Bannon et al
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Ret. Sgt. Craig T. Bennett, Francine M. Bennett, Aliyah M. Bennett and others
Defendant:
Eric J. Bannon, Kirk William Ruquet, Matthew R. Sarkissian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jung v. Peisert et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Changyoung Jung
Defendant:
Daniel A. Peisert, Paul Schwichtenberg, Heather L. Mason and others
Miller v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
James Miller
Defendant:
Juniper Networks, Inc., Rami Rahim, Anne Delsanto and others
Williams v. Callon Petroleum Company et al
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Callon Petroleum Company, Matthew R. Bob, Joseph C. Gatto, Jr. and others
Lawrence v. Daseke, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Daseke, Inc., Chuck Serianni, Jonathan Shepko and others
K Street Capital Investments LLC AQ-1 v. Information Grid Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
K Street Capital Investments LLC AQ-1
Defendant:
Information Grid Ltd., William Cowell de Gruchy, Cleve Adams and others
Clark v. PGT Innovations, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Defendant:
PGT Innovations, Inc., Rodney Hershberger, Sheree Bargabos and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
