Cases 1 - 10 of 134,361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv02578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv02579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv02580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv02586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv02585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hudson (PS) v. Weld Couny Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2025cv00866
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Hudson, Jr.
Defendant:
Weld Couny Sheriffs Office and H. Vigueria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ozsusamlar v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2025cv00061
Plaintiff:
Mustafa Ozsusamlar
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden H. Ray, Mr. Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Hyde et al
as 3:2025cv00377
Petitioner:
Marvel Johnson
Defendant:
Patricia H Hyde, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv01243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
