Cases 1 - 10 of 31,227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv04320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Robinson v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv05612
Plaintiff:
Norma Robinson
Defendant:
Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Strength of Nature, LLC, Namaste Laboratories, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Payne v. Shadid et al
as 3:2025cv01008
Plaintiff:
Kraig Payne
Defendant:
James E. Shadid, Mulick, James Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Nichols v. Rivers et al
as 2:2025cv00094
Plaintiff:
Billy Mack Nichols, Jr
Defendant:
Rivers, Tracy Bennett, Gary R Kerstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv01273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Robinson v. Beasley
as 6:2025cv00038
Petitioner:
Rodger Robinson
Respondent:
Jacob Beasley
Unknown:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2025cv02143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
