Cases 1 - 10 of 12,030
Terrence Hammock v. Zowie Barnes
as 24-6375
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDWARD HAMMOCK, JR.
Defendant:
DR. ZOWIE BARNES, M.D., DIRECTOR GAIL WATTS, OFFICER J. SHERMAN and others
In re: Daniel Barnes, III
as 24-3329
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL L. BARNES, III
Respondent:
ANTHONY DAVIS, Warden
LC Optimist, LLC v. Barnes
as 1:2024cv01732
Plaintiff:
LC Optimist, LLC
Defendant:
Kimberly Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Barnes v. Barnes
as 3:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Darene Barnes
Defendant:
Bianca R Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Barnes v. DG Retail, LLC d/b/a Dollar General
as 1:2024cv03222
Plaintiff:
Lamonte Barnes
Defendant:
DG Retail, LLC d/b/a Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
BARNES v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01658
Plaintiff:
TAMEKA A BARNES
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Jeremy Dunn, et al v. Shane Penfield, et al
as 24-1804
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dunn and Kevin Love
Defendant:
Shane Penfield, in his official and individual capacities, Penfield Law Firm Professional LLC, Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity and others
Ervin v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jackie Darrell Ervin
Defendant:
Brandon Barnes, Jamison Marriman, Dillian Seibers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Green (Johnson)
as 24-1017
Defendant:
DARRYL JOHNSON, NORMAN WORKMAN, CLAYTON GREEN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bagnall v. Dick's Sporting Goods Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bagnall
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc, Phillip Barnes and Kings River Outdoors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
