Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Herrington v. Thomas et al
as 6:2023cv06134
Plaintiff:
Robert Lane Herrington
Defendant:
Sheriff Neal Thomas, Jail Admin #1 Russ Carmack, Jail Admin #2 Brett Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeWeese v. White et al
as 4:2022cv01048
Plaintiff:
Bradley R DeWeese
Defendant:
White, Conners, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAllister v. White et al
as 4:2022cv01047
Plaintiff:
John McAllister
Defendant:
White, Conners, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. McFadden et al
as 4:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jefferson
Defendant:
McFadden, Robinson, Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Abdullah et al
as 2:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ray Martin
Defendant:
J Abdullah, B Andrews, B Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
as 4:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Dwight Conner
Defendant:
Pilgrim's Pride and Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robertson v. Does
as 4:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
Michael O Robertson and Michael Otis Robertson
Defendant:
Does Classification Board, Nurse, Staff, Officers, Pulaski County Detention Facility, Does Classification Board, Pulaski County Detention Facility, George Belt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton v. Seamster et al
as 4:2021cv00819
Plaintiff:
Carl Thornton
Defendant:
L Seamster, Pattie Conley, Jared Byers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Tims et al
as 4:2021cv00255
Defendant:
Doe, Lowe, Calvin and others
Plaintiff:
Parnell R May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Williams et al
as 4:2020cv01412
Defendant:
Conner, Wilson and Williams
Plaintiff:
Michael Otis Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
