Cases 1 - 10 of 2,510
Lamie v. Hoopes et al
as 1:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Ervin Joseph Lamie, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenneth S. Hoopes, Muskegon, County of and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
(PC) Webber v. Barrios et al
as 1:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Doyal Webber
Defendant:
J. Barrios, J. Ervin, P. Liamas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ervin v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jackie Darrell Ervin
Defendant:
Brandon Barnes, Jamison Marriman, Dillian Seibers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Williams v. Ervin et al
as 2:2024cv10998
Plaintiff:
Scott Williams
Defendant:
Samuel Ervin and Zupa Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ervin (Trollinger) v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Letitia Ervin (Trollinger)
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brent Gurney v. Nicole Ervin
as 8:2024cv00783
Petitioner:
Brent Gurney
Respondent:
Nicole Ervin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ERVIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00474
Petitioner:
STEPHANIE ERVIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Bender v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Amy Bender
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, David Ewell, Robert Cooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
